跳到正文
AI at Meta· @AIatMeta · X·· 19 天前AI 评分58
AI 导读

Meta 公布六篇论文,内容来自数学家过去数月通过 meta.ai 普通聊天界面与 Muse Spark 1.1、1.2 的 Thinking Mode 协作求解尚无现成路径的开放问题,未使用定制研究脚手架。合作遵循同一套原则:由数学家主导研究,再由另一组数学家评审,每篇论文标注哪些段落主要由人类或 AI 起草,并注明所依据的先前研究;若有其他团队独立宣布同一问题的解法,也会一并致谢。

正文 · 原文

Following gold-medal-level performance from our AI models across five competitions in mathematics, physics, and chemistry, we asked a harder question: can AI contribute when a problem is genuinely open and without an existing solution path?

Over the past several months, mathematicians worked with Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 in Thinking Mode through the regular http://meta.ai chat interface, with no custom research scaffold, to find solutions to such problems.

Our goal wasn't to mass-produce papers, but empower researchers. Every collaboration followed the same principles: mathematicians guided the research, a second group of mathematicians then reviewed the work, each paper marks which passages were drafted primarily by humans or AI, and each credits the prior research it builds on. Where other teams independently announced solutions to the same problems, we acknowledge their work as well.

Today, we're sharing six papers from that collaboration.

🧵👇

来源:AI at Meta · x.com