#Agent
AI at Meta@AIatMetaAI 评分5858
DeepSeek@deepseek_ai精选AI 评分8080推荐理由:官方给出 Harness 的插件化架构与 MIT 开源仓库,读者可据此判断它能否接入现有智能体工作流。
DeepSeek@deepseek_ai精选AI 评分8080推荐理由:官方给出 V4-Pro 的 Agent 能力升级、三档推理强度和 Codex 接入方式,可据此判断实际使用成本与场景。
Hugging Face@huggingfaceAI 评分3333AI 智能体如何复现 ICML 2026 论文 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1OxwbbdvRygJB
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分4242
DeepSeek@deepseek_ai精选AI 评分7878推荐理由:官方公布 V4-Flash API 公测,并给出 Agent 能力提升与 Codex 适配的配置入口。
Hugging Face@huggingfaceAI 评分3838训练智能体 3:学习如何通过强化学习训练一个本地/开放权重智能体 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1PKqrrbanaZGb
Berkeley AI ResearchAI 评分3838 ABBEL:通过信念状态监督让 LLM 高效完成长程交互
伯克利 AI 研究团队提出 ABBEL 框架,将 LLM 的交互摘要建模为自然语言"信念状态"并对其内容单独监督。在协作编程基准 CollabBench 上,该方法把与全上下文模型的性能差距缩小约 50%,训练步数从 100 步降至 50 步,峰值上下文 token 数也明显低于全上下文设置。
Berkeley AI ResearchAI 评分4242 智能免费之后怎么办?面向智能体、由智能体构建的数据系统
UC Berkeley 团队提出,推理成本已从 GPT-4 级约 $30/百万 token 降至不足 $1,部分厂商低于 $0.10,基准测试中推理价格每年下降 9x 至 900x、中位数约 50x。作者据此提出三类数据系统挑战:为智能体设计的数据系统、支撑智能体群体运行的数据系统、以及由智能体合成的数据系统。
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分5858引用Claude@claudeaiIntroducing Claude Tag, a new way for teams to work with Claude. In Slack, Claude joins as a team member with access to the channels and tools you choose. Tag Claude in and delegate tasks to it while you focus on other work.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分3838引用Stephanie Zhan@stephzhan@karpathy and I are back! At @sequoia AI Ascent 2026. And a lot has changed. Last year, he coined “vibe coding”. This year, he’s never felt more behind as a programmer. The big shift: vibe coding raised the floor. Agentic engineering raises the ceiling. We talk about what it means to build seriously in the agent era. Not just moving faster. Building new things, with new tools, while preserving the parts that still require human taste, judgment, and understanding.
Mira Murati@miramuratiAI 评分2525引用Luke Drago@luke_drago_Cat’s out of the bag! Today @WorkshopLabs is joining @ThinkyMachines. We started Workshop Labs to build towards a world where people still matter, even as powerful AI advances. I want to talk a bit about why this is the best move to serve that mission.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分3636引用staysaasy@staysaasyThe degree to which you are awed by AI is perfectly correlated with how much you use AI to code.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分6060引用Farza 🇵🇰🇺🇸@FarzaTVThis is Farzapedia. I had an LLM take 2,500 entries from my diary, Apple Notes, and some iMessage convos to create a personal Wikipedia for me. It made 400 detailed articles for my friends, my startups, research areas, and even my favorite animes and their impact on me complete with backlinks. But, this Wiki was not built for me! I built it for my agent! The structure of the wiki files and how it's all backlinked is very easily crawlable by any agent + makes it a truly useful knowledge base. I can spin up Claude Code on the wiki and starting at index.md (a catalog of all my articles) the agent does a really good job at drilling into the specific pages on my wiki it needs context on when I have a query. For example, when trying to cook up a new landing page I may ask: "I'm trying to design this landing page for a new idea I have. Please look into the images and films that inspired me recently and give me ideas for new copy and aesthetics". In my diary I kept track of everything from: learnings, people, inspo, interesting links, images. So the agent reads my wiki and pulls up my "Philosophy" articles from notes on a Studio Ghibli documentary, "Competitor" articles with YC companies whose landing pages I screenshotted, and pics of 1970s Beatles merch I saved years ago. And it delivers a great answer. I built a similar system to this a year ago with RAG but it was ass. A knowledge base that lets an agent find what it needs via a file system it actually understands just works better. The most magical thing now is as I add new things to my wiki (articles, images of inspo, meeting notes) the system will likely update 2-3 different articles where it feels that context belongs, or, just creates a new article. It's like this super genius librarian for your brain that's always filing stuff for your perfectly and also let's you easily query the knowledge for tasks useful to you (ex. design, product, writing, etc) and it never gets tired. I might spend next week productizing this, if that's of interest to you DM me + tell me your usecase!
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分2222引用Harry Rushworth@HrushworthThe British Government is a complicated beast. Dozens of departments, hundreds of public bodies, more corporations than one can count... Such is its complexity that there isn't an org chart for it. Well, there wasn't... Introducing ⚙️Machinery of Government⚙️
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分6262引用Andrej Karpathy@karpathyLLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分6060
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分5858Andrej Karpathy 回顾约一年前搭建 menugen 的经历,认为最难的不是代码本身,而是服务、支付、认证、数据库、安全、域名等一整套 DevOps 组装。
引用Patrick Collison@patrickcWhen @karpathy built MenuGen (https://karpathy.bearblog.dev/vibe-coding-menugen/), he said: "Vibe coding menugen was exhilarating and fun escapade as a local demo, but a bit of a painful slog as a deployed, real app. Building a modern app is a bit like assembling IKEA future. There are all these services, docs, API keys, configurations, dev/prod deployments, team and security features, rate limits, pricing tiers." We've all run into this issue when building with agents: you have to scurry off to establish accounts, clicking things in the browser as though it's the antediluvian days of 2023, in order to unblock its superintelligent progress. So we decided to build Stripe Projects to help agents instantly provision services from the CLI. For example, simply run: $ stripe projects add posthog/analytics And it'll create a PostHog account, get an API key, and (as needed) set up billing. Projects is launching today as a developer preview. You can register for access (we'll make it available to everyone soon) at http://projects.dev. We're also rolling out support for many new providers over the coming weeks. (Get in touch if you'd like to make your service available.) https://projects.dev
Mira Murati@miramuratiAI 评分5858引用Thinking Machines@thinkymachinesTinker is now generally available. We also added support for advanced vision input models, Kimi K2 Thinking, and a simpler way to sample from models. https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/tinker-general-availability/
DeepSeek@deepseek_ai精选AI 评分8080推荐理由:官方给出两个版本的定位差异与开放渠道,可据此判断面向智能体的推理模型如何分层落地。