#Agent

Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability. The first issue I think is around recency and tier of use. I think a lot of people tried the free tier of ChatGPT somewhere last year and allowed it to inform their views on AI a little too much. This is a group of reactions laughing at various quirks of the models, hallucinations, etc. Yes I also saw the viral videos of OpenAI's Advanced Voice mode fumbling simple queries like "should I drive or walk to the carwash". The thing is that these free and old/deprecated models don't reflect the capability in the latest round of state of the art agentic models of this year, especially OpenAI Codex and Claude Code. But that brings me to the second issue. Even if people paid $200/month to use the state of the art models, a lot of the capabilities are relatively "peaky" in highly technical areas. Typical queries around search, writing, advice, etc. are *not* the domain that has made the most noticeable and dramatic strides in capability. Partly, this is due to the technical details of reinforcement learning and its use of verifiable rewards. But partly, it's also because these use cases are not sufficiently prioritized by the companies in their hillclimbing because they don't lead to as much $$$ value. The goldmines are elsewhere, and the focus comes along. So that brings me to the second group of people, who *both* 1) pay for and use the state of the art frontier agentic models (OpenAI Codex / Claude Code) and 2) do so professionally in technical domains like programming, math and research. This group of people is subject to the highest amount of "AI Psychosis" because the recent improvements in these domains as of this year have been nothing short of staggering. When you hand a computer terminal to one of these models, you can now watch them melt programming problems that you'd normally expect to take days/weeks of work. It's this second group of people that assigns a much greater gravity to the capabilities, their slope, and various cyber-related repercussions. TLDR the people in these two groups are speaking past each other. It really is simultaneously the case that OpenAI's free and I think slightly orphaned (?) "Advanced Voice Mode" will fumble the dumbest questions in your Instagram's reels and *at the same time*, OpenAI's highest-tier and paid Codex model will go off for 1 hour to coherently restructure an entire code base, or find and exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems. This part really works and has made dramatic strides because 2 properties: 1) these domains offer explicit reward functions that are verifiable meaning they are easily amenable to reinforcement learning training (e.g. unit tests passed yes or no, in contrast to writing, which is much harder to explicitly judge), but also 2) they are a lot more valuable in b2b settings, meaning that the biggest fraction of the team is focused on improving them. So here we are.

We're extending FREE Qwen 3.8 Max + Flash for 7 more days! And we've increased rate limits across all 3 models. Built something with Qwen or Wan? Show us what you've got! Tag us and @Alibaba_Qwen or @Alibaba_Wan. We'll pick 3 winners based on: 🏆 Most creative 🏆 Most challenging 🏆 Most effort put in Each winner gets $200 cash + $200 in GMI credits!

Connecting agents together safely and having them talk to each other or your friends agents used to suck. Point your agent to http://connect.bolter.chat and it instantly solves this problem, works with @claudeai, @bot, @Muse, Openclaw, Hermes and more. Unleash your agents into a swarm, borrow each others compute! go nuts!

🚨 The incentives to share scientific knowledge openly are crumbling. Historically, researchers shared scientific knowledge for two primary reasons: (1) the prestige conferred by discovery, and (2) a sense of expanding the pool of human knowledge. Even within industry, scientific discovery was far too vast an endeavor for a single scientist or team to tackle alone. So scientists explored different frontiers, usually published their findings, and collectively moved the field forward. However, as more scientific knowledge is uncovered simply by throwing massive compute at autonomous agents with minimal human intervention, these incentives are breaking down: (1) discoveries are becoming commoditized. If anyone could have found the same result simply by running the same agentic prompt with enough compute, the prestige of discovery and the pride in one's work disappears, a shift we are already witnessing in software engineering. (2) the explosion of low-quality, low-barrier publications makes genuine breakthroughs increasingly difficult to filter, discover, and appropriately credit. (3) and for companies, keeping discoveries proprietary is increasingly advantageous. Instead of publishing and waiting for the broader scientific community to build upon the work, an organization can simply turn its own compute back onto the problem to iterate faster internally. In the short term, the incentives reward secrecy. But my goal -- and at Hugging Face, our goal -- is the sustainable, long-term expansion of human knowledge that survives individual, closed companies. So we have to build new tools that reward and facilitate open sharing of knowledge. If agents are accelerating discovery, we are going to figure out how to use agents and other tools to preserve scientific integrity. Starting with this: Paper Reproductions with ML Intern -- we’ve made it possible to take a published paper and task agents with independently reproducing its experiments, helping create more signals (e.g. open artifacts) that can help identify high-quality work.

Qwen3.8-27B is now live on Nebius Token Factory. A compact 27B dense model for coding, research, and agent workflows, with a focus on planning and completing tasks across multiple steps. Start building: https://tokenfactory.nebius.com/endpoints?modals=endpoint-details&model-id=Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B

We built Money Agent, a personal finance assistant powered by @Alibaba_Qwen 3.8 27B on Cerebras. Now you can turn a home-buying question into a real-time conversation, then into a financial goal, faster.

Muse is now available on Mac 💻. Your personal agent can get things done for you directly on your computer (all with your explicit permission). - Organize your downloads folder - Find a file you’ve lost track of - Summarize your messages and notes …more coming soon. Try Muse for Mac: http://ai.meta.com/muse/download/

Our own @johnschulman2 talks with Dwarkesh about where human judgment still matters as models improve and self-improve: teaching them to handle messy real-world tasks, applying taste to what works in the long run, and, above all, specifying what we actually want.

Introducing Muse, your personal AI agent from Meta that gets things done across every part of life. Download the Muse app and get started: https://Muse.ai

1/ we just publicly released Muse Spark 1.3 max! we see significantly stronger coding and agentic performance on muse spark 1.3 max, so would strongly recommend trying it out even if you've already tried muse spark 1.3 high or muse spark 1.3 xhigh.