Addy Osmani 等谈 Claude Code 团队的代码审查方式
Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang
Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt 和 Qing Wang 在《How the Claude Code team does code review》中提出，"人是否读过代码"只是判断变更风险的粗略替代指标，更该问哪项检查能抓住问题。他们称代码审查已从 PR 末尾的关卡变成持续进行，多数变更在人工查看前已被 Claude 至少审查并修复过一次。
16th October 2026
We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"
Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.
Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.
— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review
来源：Simon Willison · simonwillison.net